Beta documentation quality

Subject: Beta documentation quality
From: p -dot- vuncanon -at- att -dot- net
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 21:37:07 +0000

Does anyone out there have a list of criteria they adhere to for beta-quality documentation?

Some tech pub folks say that beta doc is merely a snapshot of the documentation as it stands at the beta release timeframe. Others say that as long as you have a Beta watermark on the beta doc than you should be covered. I was curious if there's a more rigorous set of criteria that anyone uses to decide if their doc is beta quality or not. Thanks.

Use Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word, or HTML and
produce desktop, Web, or print deliverables. Just write (or import)
and Doc-To-Help does the rest. Free trial:

Explore CAREER options and paths related to Technical Writing,
learn to create SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS documents, and
get tips on FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATION best practices. Free at:

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:


Previous by Author: RE: Sharepoint as an LMS
Next by Author: UI description standards
Previous by Thread: RE: billable hours
Next by Thread: RE: Beta documentation quality

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads