Re: UI description standards

Subject: Re: UI description standards
From: <neilson -at- windstream -dot- net>
To: p -dot- vuncanon -at- att -dot- net, techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 16:29:00 -0500

---- p -dot- vuncanon -at- att -dot- net wrote:
> [debate] eliminating screen shots ... strong opinions on both sides

Keep both sides. Some documents need them. In other documents they are useless overhead. Your standards should not be so rigid as to presume that all documents require them or should not have them. Seek out a way to provide guidance for those trying to make the decision for each document.
-Peter Neilson

Use Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word, or HTML and
produce desktop, Web, or print deliverables. Just write (or import)
and Doc-To-Help does the rest. Free trial:

- Use this space to communicate with TECHWR-L readers -
- Contact admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com for more information -

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:

UI description standards: From: p . vuncanon

Previous by Author: RE: Screen Capture Software?
Next by Author: Re: UI description standards
Previous by Thread: Re: UI description standards
Next by Thread: UI description standards

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads