Re: Not an acronymn....

Subject: Re: Not an acronymn....
From: Bill Swallow <techcommdood -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: mattgras -at- comcast -dot- net
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 13:58:25 -0400

> Yeah, well -- I don't consider wikipedia an ultimate source. Just because it considers "K9" an abbreviation don't make it so...

Except that Wikipedia in this case is correct. Look up abbreviation
and then initialism, acronym, numeronym, or any other text condensing
grammatical form in your reference of choice. ;)

I do love this list's recent trend in arguing back with those
answering your questions. It makes for interesting reading. Not
necessarily good reading, but interesting reading. ;)

Bill Swallow

Twitter: @techcommdood

Available for contract and full time opportunities.

Gain access to everything you need to create and publish documentation,
manuals, and other information through multiple channels. Choose
authoring (and import) as well as virtually any output you may need.

- Use this space to communicate with TECHWR-L readers -
- Contact admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com for more information -

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:

Re: Not an acronymn....: From: Wade Courtney
Re: Not an acronymn....: From: mattgras

Previous by Author: Re: Not an acronymn....
Next by Author: Re: Not an acronymn....
Previous by Thread: Re: Not an acronymn....
Next by Thread: Re: Not an acronymn....

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads