Re: What passes, and what doesn't

Subject: Re: What passes, and what doesn't
From: Peter Neilson <neilson -at- windstream -dot- net>
To: "McLauchlan, Kevin" <Kevin -dot- McLauchlan -at- safenet-inc -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 12:47:39 -0400

McLauchlan, Kevin wrote:
> Would you use a sub-section title "Peaceful Coexistence"
> to head up a paragraph alerting buyers of the latest
> generation of a serious product that they can connect three
> different peripheral devices simultaneously?

Absolutely not. It is a politically charged term, and even today
suggests compromises with or among communism, socialism, fascism or some
other oppressive system.

Here is an historical reference, which refers to the term as "Orwellian":

Gain access to everything you need to create and publish documentation,
manuals, and other information through multiple channels. Choose
authoring (and import) as well as virtually any output you may need.

- Use this space to communicate with TECHWR-L readers -
- Contact admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com for more information -

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:

What passes, and what doesn't: From: McLauchlan, Kevin

Previous by Author: Re: Page layout resources
Next by Author: Re: Charging for information
Previous by Thread: Re: What passes, and what doesn't
Next by Thread: Re: What passes, and what doesn't

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads