Re: Information -- a working definition?

Subject: Re: Information -- a working definition?
From: Milan Davidović <milan -dot- lists -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: Chris Despopoulos <despopoulos_chriss -at- yahoo -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 12:08:37 -0400

On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Chris Despopoulos
<despopoulos_chriss -at- yahoo -dot- com> wrote:
> It might be useful to actually try and define information..

Have there been past efforts to do so (within technical
communication), and if so what became of them?

This article from the journal Telecommunications Policy indicates the
challenges of defining information in another (though not necessarily
completely separate) domain, and may be of interest to our own:

Milan DavidoviÄ

Gain access to everything you need to create and publish documentation,
manuals, and other information through multiple channels. Choose
authoring (and import) as well as virtually any output you may need.

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:


Information -- a working definition?: From: Chris Despopoulos

Previous by Author: Re: Resolved: Technical communicators can create information
Next by Author: Re: Information -- a working definition?
Previous by Thread: Information -- a working definition?
Next by Thread: Re: Information -- a working definition?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads