Re: Anthropomorphism is bad because...

Subject: Re: Anthropomorphism is bad because...
From: Milan Davidović <milan -dot- lists -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: "McLauchlan, Kevin" <Kevin -dot- McLauchlan -at- safenet-inc -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 12:20:00 -0400

On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 11:52 AM, McLauchlan, Kevin
<Kevin -dot- McLauchlan -at- safenet-inc -dot- com> wrote:
> But what actually is wrong/bad/evil/hurtful/crushingly-destructive-of-communication
> to say that a complex computerized system "expects" a certain input or range of
> inputs in a given situation? Â (... and gets miffed if you try to feed it
> anything else....... ok, that's a bit extreme).

Can you point us to a particular example of someone making such a claim?

Milan DavidoviÄ

Gain access to everything you need to create and publish documentation,
manuals, and other information through multiple channels. Choose
authoring (and import) as well as virtually any output you may need.

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:


Anthropomorphism is bad because...: From: McLauchlan, Kevin

Previous by Author: Re: Information -- a working definition?
Next by Author: Re: Anthropomorphism is bad because...
Previous by Thread: Anthropomorphism is bad because...
Next by Thread: RE: Anthropomorphism is bad because...

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads