Re: Great technical communication

Subject: Re: Great technical communication
From: Richard Mateosian <xrmxrm -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 11:37:15 -0700

I sent this the other day and received an incomprehensible
non-delivery message with a non-existent reply address. I haven't seen
responses, so I'm trying again.

The Washington Post put together a website
( illustrating the interconnected national
security agencies and the companies that work with them.

It's a really good example of technical communication. I hope one of
the nearby STC competitions will invite them to submit it. ...RM


Richard Mateosian <xrm -at- pacbell -dot- net>
Berkeley, California

Gain access to everything you need to create and publish information
through multiple channels. Your choice of authoring (and import)
formats with virtually any output. Try Doc-To-Help free for 30-days.

LavaCon 2010 in San Diego Sept 29&#8211;Oct 2 is now open for registration.
Use referral code TECHWR-L for $50 off conference tuition!
See program at:

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:


Great technical communication: From: Richard Mateosian

Previous by Author: Re: Plan Your Dream Department Tools
Next by Author: Re: Google maps problem
Previous by Thread: Great technical communication
Next by Thread: RE: Great technical communication

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads