TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Bill Swallow <techcommdood -at- gmail -dot- com>wrote:
> > 1. A friend has asked me to edit and rewrite a 200-page biography of a
> > family member. From the posts I have read so far, the recommendations are
> > charge by the hour. I wonder what other members would feel is a fair
> > This is a good friend and I want to charge a fair but modest rate. Does
> > anyone have any recommendations?
> Did the good friend indicate they wanted to pay you for this? For a
> good friend, I would ask them what they'd feel comfortable paying and
> go from there. But in general, for a good friend's need of something
> rather personal like this, I'd barter for favors. What skills do they
> have that you could make use of?
> > 2. I am on a contract job and using Word to document an application. My
> > manager has asked to outline the benefits of going with FrameMaker
> > of Word. I have a draft in Word and my idea is to show a mock up of a
> > FrameMaker document to visually display the quality difference.
> > My question is, does anyone know of a website or blog that specifically
> > shows Frame's superiority? I have found a few but nothing with a strong
> > compare/contrast. I just thought someone might have found an informative
> > blog.
> There are power users out there for either tool, and they will stand
> by their choice. You're attacking the tank's shell from the side with
> a baseball bat. You need to take it out from the inside. Show the
> client's needs and your ability to satisfy them (or inability to)
> using both tools. Show them the money. Then when they open the hatch,
> jump in and start swinging. ;-)
> Yeah, bad analogy.
> But, questions:
> * Do they have staff writers or are you it?
No writer has been present for over 5 years. Service company switching
user functionality. what was expected to one guide has grown into two
levels of users,
and a potential 3rd in the future. Frame's ability to create different
books and correctly
update TOCs/Indexes, etc. would make life much easier.
> * Who works on the docs if/when your contract engagement ends, and
> what are their abilities with the tools?
> If contract is not extended, there will not be a writer until the next set
> of functionality is complete.
> Engineers would like to see content management system in place in the
> future. My thinking is
> Frame would be a better foundation to migrate from.
> * What else, aside from the content development, might be impacted by
> your tool switch? Do you author Help? Do others leverage your content
> for their needs (training, marketing, support, other)?
> There is no help authoring at present but would be desired in future. Frame
> came with WebWorks which would have been sufficient. GUI planned but
> impacted by slow software cycles. No leverage of other departments at
> present. Training
> might be used in the future.
Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help.
Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need. Try
Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days. http://www.doctohelp.com
LavaCon 2010 in San Diego Sept 29 - Oct 2 is now open for registration.
Use referral code TECHWR-L for $50 off conference tuition!
See program at: http://lavacon.org/
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-