TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: throughput From:Mohan Arun L <marun2 -at- gmail -dot- com> To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com Date:Thu, 27 Jan 2011 14:55:24 +0530
I would put the word "throughput" in a tooltip that appears on mouse hover
above the actual speed indication like 5 MBps.
>>From: "Daniel Feiglin" <daniel_f -at- radwin -dot- com>
>>Subject: RE: throughput
>>Is there an accepted short form or abbreviation of the word "throughput"
>>in the context of data transmission? It is too long to fit into the text
>>area of a small status widget.
>>"Oh well, I guess it will have to be Tput."
Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help.
Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need. Try
Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days. http://www.doctohelp.com
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-