Subject: Re: WIKIPEDIA
From: Lauren <lauren -at- writeco -dot- net>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:58:22 -0800

No, Leonard, you are mistaken. Wikipedia *claims* to be an encyclopedia
and it strives to be an encyclopedia, but it is maintained by people who
lack the qualifications to provide "a work that contains information on
all branches of knowledge." "Knowledge" is the operative term here,
since "knowledge" within the constructs of an encyclopedia requires
conveyance of generally accepted true statements. Wikipedia permits
opinions, weakly supported arguments, and controversy, so wikipedia, in
spite of its goal to be an encyclopedia, is not an encyclopedia.


On 2/10/2011 2:45 PM, Porrello, Leonard wrote:
> > From the URL you provided: "Wikipedia is an encyclopedic reference...."
> And if we are going to be pedestrian, then an "encyclopedia" is "a book, often in many volumes, containing articles on various topics, often arranged in alphabetical order, dealing either with the whole range of human knowledge or with one particular subject."
> Notice the definition speaks of "human knowledge" (not "opinion" or "conjecture"). Knowledge is "the sum of what is known | the body of truth, information, and principles acquired by humankind."


Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help.
Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need. Try
Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:


WIKIPEDIA: From: RÃdacteur en chef
RE: WIKIPEDIA: From: Porrello, Leonard
RE: WIKIPEDIA: From: Dan Goldstein
RE: WIKIPEDIA: From: Porrello, Leonard
RE: WIKIPEDIA: From: Dan Goldstein
RE: WIKIPEDIA: From: Porrello, Leonard

Previous by Author: Re: WIKIPEDIA
Next by Author: Re: WIKIPEDIA
Previous by Thread: RE: WIKIPEDIA
Next by Thread: RE: WIKIPEDIA

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads