Re: Two-way or 2-way

Subject: Re: Two-way or 2-way
From: Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: "Bruce Megan (ST-CO/ENS5-NA)" <Megan -dot- Bruce -at- us -dot- bosch -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:26:33 -0800

Context? Grammatically, "two-way" would be preferable, but "2-way" has
been the prevailing usage in the audio industry since the 1950's. Don't
know about any other environments.

Gene Kim-Eng

On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Bruce Megan (ST-CO/ENS5-NA) <
Megan -dot- Bruce -at- us -dot- bosch -dot- com> wrote:

> I was curious as to everyone's thought on these two words? Which is most
> accepted?

Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help.
Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need. Try
Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Two-way or 2-way: From: Bruce Megan (ST-CO/ENS5-NA)

Previous by Author: Re: Automation vs. User-created
Next by Author: Re: Some hardware is durable
Previous by Thread: RE: Two-way or 2-way
Next by Thread: Re: Two-way or 2-way

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads