software is part of the device (Was "FDA (b)anality")

Subject: software is part of the device (Was "FDA (b)anality")
From: Phil Snow Leopard <philstokes03 -at- googlemail -dot- com>
To: Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:30:20 +0700

Agree with the advice given (i.e, don't mess with regulatory language unless you don't want to get approval from the regulatory body), but this caught my eye:


> Once loaded, the software becomes part of a "device."

Not sure where you got that from. Are you suggesting this in general, or as something peculiar to FDA?

I've spend a lot of time poring over Apple's EULAs for their OS software, and believe me, they are NOT part of the device. You own the device, you never own Apple's software. You own a licences to use it.

Not starting an argument, you understand, just interested where that remark came from (in fact, I'd more than happily start the argument with Apple if I could... ;) ).



Phil Stokes
Tech Writer:
http://applehelpwriter.com




^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help.
Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need. Try
Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.
http://www.doctohelp.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


Follow-Ups:

References:
FDA (b)anality: From: Chris Morton
Re: FDA (b)anality: From: Gene Kim-Eng

Previous by Author: Re: Disagreeing with house styles
Next by Author: Re: software is part of the device (Was "FDA (b)anality")
Previous by Thread: Re: FDA (b)anality
Next by Thread: Re: software is part of the device (Was "FDA (b)anality")


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads