Re: FDA (b)anality

Subject: Re: FDA (b)anality
From: Milan Davidović <milan -dot- lists -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: salt -dot- morton -at- gmail -dot- com
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:46:58 -0500

On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Chris Morton <salt -dot- morton -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:
> Because the software is not a device, I modified the statement to read:
> CAUTION: Federal law restricts this product to the sale by, or on the order
> of, a physician.

What did you think would be the consquences of leaving the statement
as it was (i.e. with "device")?

Milan DavidoviÄ

Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help.
Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need. Try
Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @


FDA (b)anality: From: Chris Morton

Previous by Author: Re: interface editing
Next by Author: Re: Ideas for Help 2.0
Previous by Thread: RE: FDA (b)anality
Next by Thread: Re: FDA (b)anality

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads