Re: Non-technical technical writers

Subject: Re: Non-technical technical writers
From: Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: dana -at- campbellsci -dot- com
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:12:24 -0800

Did I read the OP wrong? I thought the topic of this thread was a tech
writer's concern about not getting the opportunity OTJ to maintain and
improve technical savvy-ness regarding the latest tools and techniques in
tech writing.

Gene Kim-Eng

On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Dana Worley (MVP/JB)
<dana -at- campbellsci -dot- com>wrote:

> I find it interesting that on a list of technical writers, there are many
> people who say they rate on a scale of 1 to 3 when it comes to being
> technically savvy.

Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help.
Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need. Try
Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @

Non-technical technical writers: From: Dana Worley (MVP/JB)

Previous by Author: Re: Non-technical technical writers
Next by Author: Re: Techno-fuddyduddy getting anxious
Previous by Thread: Re: Non-technical technical writers
Next by Thread: Re: Non-technical technical writers

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads