Re: TECHWR-L Digest, Vol 76, Issue 21

Subject: Re: TECHWR-L Digest, Vol 76, Issue 21
From: Jack Elder <elderj -at- wetafx -dot- co -dot- nz>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:36:29 +1300

On 22/02/12 19:55, techwr-l-request -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com wrote:

Hi Carla,
Australians could handle this, but New Zealanders might be a bit upset. Asia Pacific might be a better option, but that includes other Pacific islands, like Papua New Guinea and Fiji. I would list them separately.

As a New Zealander... It's mildly irritating, but we're used to it. The degree of irritation would probably come from how much of an afterthought NZ appeared to be - for example, if you clearly split out most other countries but then lumped NZ in with Australia as an afterthought it'd be pretty annoying. Also note that if you're listing more than about ten countries, we're going to expect to be able to find NZ under an alphabetical list - so you may miss out on customers who look under N, can't find it, but don't think to check under A.

Also notice that in NZ, a common usage is "Aotearoa/NZ", using both the Maori and English names for our country. This could cause confusion between "Australia/NZ" as well.

One solution that I see a lot (for example, on is to have a dropdown with the five or six most common entries at the top - and then a divider, followed by a full alphabetical list of countries underneath.

Country listings are surprisingly tricky. When I lived in England, it was always fun finding whether the country was listed as England, United Kingdom, Great Britain, or just Britain.

Cheers from NZ;


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @

Previous by Author: TechWhirl: Technical Communications Recap for February 24, 2012
Next by Author: RE: Freelance opportunity
Previous by Thread: Re: [in]consistency of fonts
Next by Thread: CareerTrack reviews?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads