Re: More Low Paying Jobs

Subject: Re: More Low Paying Jobs
From: Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: Dan Goldstein <DGoldstein -at- riveraintech -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 14:07:12 -0800

Yes, but the regulatory scrutiny will be based on the documentation being
there and being technically accurate. Regulators don't
evaluate documentation for usability or even grammar and spelling.

Gene Kim-Eng

On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Dan Goldstein
<DGoldstein -at- riveraintech -dot- com>wrote:

> Unlike some positions we've seen, that job can't be filled by a
> desperate TW lacking the proper skills. Gene Kim-Eng can correct me on
> this one, but "complex digital avionic products" are probably subject to
> severe regulatory scrutiny. Substandard documentation could put the
> company at risk for losing the contract altogether.

Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help. Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need.

Try Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @

More Low Paying Jobs: From: Stephen Arrants
RE: More Low Paying Jobs: From: Dan Goldstein

Previous by Author: Re: More Low Paying Jobs
Next by Author: Re: More Low Paying Jobs
Previous by Thread: RE: More Low Paying Jobs
Next by Thread: RE: More Low Paying Jobs

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads