RE: Windows Search alternatives

Subject: RE: Windows Search alternatives
From: "Dan Goldstein" <DGoldstein -at- riveraintech -dot- com>
To: <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 08:21:29 -0400

Personally, I disqualified it back in 2004 because it included "an
update feature that permits the company to automatically install new
versions of the program on users' computers without user intervention or
knowledge" (according to the New York Times).


-----Original Message-----
From: McLauchlan, Kevin
Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 10:19 PM
To: John G; Robert Lauriston
Cc: TECHWR-L Writing
Subject: RE: Windows Search alternatives

Didn't it get withdrawn because a bunch of companies forbade employees
to have it, on the grounds that it gave a certain giant search company
an inside look at other people's business and secrets? Or they thought
it did, which is just as fatal to adoption of a piece of software.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John G
> Sent: March-11-12 3:37 PM
> To: Robert Lauriston
> Cc: TECHWR-L Writing
> Subject: Re: Windows Search alternatives
>
> If you can find a copy of Google Desktop (since withdrawn) it still
> works.
>
>


This message contains confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the addressee, or the person responsible for delivering it to the addressee, you are hereby notified that reading, disseminating, distributing, copying, electronic storing or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message by mistake, please notify us, by replying to the sender, and delete the original message immediately thereafter. Thank you.


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help. Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need.

Try Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.

http://bit.ly/doc-to-help

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


References:
Windows Search alternatives: From: Robert Lauriston
Re: Windows Search alternatives: From: John G
RE: Windows Search alternatives: From: McLauchlan, Kevin

Previous by Author: RE: Windows Search alternatives
Next by Author: RE: Regarding the "Next" button
Previous by Thread: RE: Windows Search alternatives
Next by Thread: font consistency and corporate look


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads