Re: Post on Technical Writing vs. Technical Communication

Subject: Re: Post on Technical Writing vs. Technical Communication
From: Keith Hood <klhra -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 17:20:57 -0700 (PDT)

That's another reason we shouldn't be considered real engineers.  We don't get to blow s**t up. 


________________________________
From: Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: Keith Hood <klhra -at- yahoo -dot- com>
Cc: Andrew Warren <awarren -at- synaptics -dot- com>; "techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Sent: Thursday, April 5, 2012 12:08 AM
Subject: Re: Post on Technical Writing vs. Technical Communication


And you think that engineers have formulas that provide repeatable, valid results for estimating the progress of design projects?  Costs?  Whether the darned thing is going to work the first time?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Z-3fjg4dYY

Gene Kim-Eng



On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Keith Hood <klhra -at- yahoo -dot- com> wrote:

When we finally come up with a formula that provides repeatable valid results for estimating minutes per page to create a help system, then we can call ourselves engineers.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help. Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need.

Try Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.

http://bit.ly/doc-to-help

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


References:
Post on Technical Writing vs. Technical Communication: From: Cardimon, Craig
RE: Post on Technical Writing vs. Technical Communication: From: Dan Goldstein
RE: Post on Technical Writing vs. Technical Communication: From: Cardimon, Craig
RE: Post on Technical Writing vs. Technical Communication: From: Dan Goldstein
RE: Post on Technical Writing vs. Technical Communication: From: Steve Janoff (non-Celgene)
RE: Post on Technical Writing vs. Technical Communication: From: Cardimon, Craig
RE: Post on Technical Writing vs. Technical Communication: From: Steve Janoff (non-Celgene)
Re: Post on Technical Writing vs. Technical Communication: From: Peter Neilson
Re: Post on Technical Writing vs. Technical Communication: From: Gene Kim-Eng
Re: Post on Technical Writing vs. Technical Communication: From: Peter Neilson
RE: Post on Technical Writing vs. Technical Communication: From: Andrew Warren
Re: Post on Technical Writing vs. Technical Communication: From: Gene Kim-Eng
Re: Post on Technical Writing vs. Technical Communication: From: Keith Hood
Re: Post on Technical Writing vs. Technical Communication: From: Gene Kim-Eng

Previous by Author: Re: Post on Technical Writing vs. Technical Communication
Next by Author: Re: Post on Technical Writing vs. Technical Communication
Previous by Thread: Re: Post on Technical Writing vs. Technical Communication
Next by Thread: RE: Post on Technical Writing vs. Technical Communication


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads