Re: Post on Technical Writing vs. Technical Communication

Subject: Re: Post on Technical Writing vs. Technical Communication
From: Kaye Adkins <kadkinsphd -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: "philstokes03 -at- gmail -dot- com" <philstokes03 -at- gmail -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 21:38:48 -0500

This made my day!

Kaye Adkins

On Thursday, April 5, 2012, philstokes03 -at- gmail -dot- com wrote:

> Aside from diagrams and photographs... :)
> Sent from my Nokia phone
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keith Hood
> Sent: 06/04/2012, 07:20
> To: Gene Kim-Eng
> Cc: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com <javascript:;>
> Subject: Re: Post on Technical Writing vs. Technical Communication
>
>
> That's another reason we shouldn't be considered real engineers. We don't
> get to blow s**t up.
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com <javascript:;>>
> To: Keith Hood <klhra -at- yahoo -dot- com <javascript:;>>
> Cc: Andrew Warren <awarren -at- synaptics -dot- com <javascript:;>>; "
> techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com <javascript:;>" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com<javascript:;>
> >
> Sent: Thursday, April 5, 2012 12:08 AM
> Subject: Re: Post on Technical Writing vs. Technical Communication
>
>
> And you think that engineers have formulas that provide repeatable, valid
> results for estimating the progress of design projects? Costs? Whether
> the darned thing is going to work the first time?
>
>
> Submarine Launched Trident PEM-1 Launch Failure<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Z-3fjg4dYY>
>
> Gene Kim-Eng
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Keith Hood <klhra -at- yahoo -dot- com <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> When we finally come up with a formula that provides repeatable valid
> results for estimating minutes per page to create a help system, then we
> can call ourselves engineers.
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with
> Doc-To-Help. Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need.
>
> Try Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.
>
> http://bit.ly/doc-to-help
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as philstokes03 -at- googlemail -dot- com<javascript:;>
> .
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com <javascript:;>
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com <javascript:;>. Visit
> http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
> info.
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online
> magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with
> Doc-To-Help. Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need.
>
> Try Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.
>
> http://bit.ly/doc-to-help
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as kadkinsphd -at- gmail -dot- com<javascript:;>
> .
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com <javascript:;>
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com <javascript:;>. Visit
> http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
> info.
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online
> magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
>


--
Less may be more, but you can't do more with less.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help. Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need.

Try Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.

http://bit.ly/doc-to-help

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


References:
RE: Post on Technical Writing vs. Technical Communication: From: philstokes03 -at- gmail -dot- com

Previous by Author: Re: one word, not "if", for "as long as"
Next by Author: Re: Post on Technical Writing vs. Technical Communication
Previous by Thread: RE: Post on Technical Writing vs. Technical Communication
Next by Thread: RE: Post on Technical Writing vs. Technical Communication


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads