RE: css media types specification

Subject: RE: css media types specification
From: "Combs, Richard" <richard -dot- combs -at- Polycom -dot- com>
To: e-letter <inpost -at- gmail -dot- com>, "techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:31:26 -0700

The anonymous entity known only as e-letter wrote:

> The css2.1 specification is being studied, <snip>

I'm sure it usually is, by someone somewhere. :-)

Or are you the one doing the studying, and this is just a belated attempt to join in the celebration of Passive Voice Day? (

Richard G. Combs
Senior Technical Writer
Polycom, Inc.
richardDOTcombs AT polycomDOTcom
rgcombs AT gmailDOTcom

Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help. Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need.

Try Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @

css media types specification: From: e-letter

Previous by Author: RE: one word, not "if", for "as long as"
Next by Author: RE: SharePoint for Review Copies
Previous by Thread: css media types specification

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads