RE: Dilbert Today

Subject: RE: Dilbert Today
From: <Brian -dot- Henderson -at- mitchell1 -dot- com>
To: <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 07:01:59 -0700

That was actually my thought too...typical clueless engineer. Especially
when Adams has the writer claim to be highly trained. Really makes him
seem like bag of hot air.


-----Original Message----- From: Bruce Megan

I thought it was funny from the opposite view....we have more than a few
engineers that fancy themselves Word Smiths! I just don't have the heart
to burst their bubble.

Megan from Mosquito Haven Minnesota...(have one flying around my
desk...*SMACK*....taken care of.


Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help. Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need.

Try Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @


Dilbert Today: From: Brian.Henderson
Re: Dilbert Today: From: Gene Kim-Eng
RE: Dilbert Today: From: Bruce Megan (ST-CO/ENS2.5-NA)

Previous by Author: Dilbert Today
Next by Author: RE: Dilbert Today
Previous by Thread: RE: Dilbert Today
Next by Thread: RE: Dilbert Today

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads