RE: NLA (no longer an acronym)?

Subject: RE: NLA (no longer an acronym)?
From: "Combs, Richard" <richard -dot- combs -at- Polycom -dot- com>
To: Lauren <lauren -at- writeco -dot- net>, "techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 12:59:19 -0700

Lauren wrote:

> > The confusion is that military contracts frequently require an
> acronym list
> > which is really an abbreviation and acronym list.
> And what is "Techwhirl"?

That's a list, too. :-)

Richard G. Combs
Senior Technical Writer
Polycom, Inc.
richardDOTcombs AT polycomDOTcom
rgcombs AT gmailDOTcom

Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help. Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need.

Try Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @


Re: NLA (no longer an acronym)?: From: Lauren

Previous by Author: RE: FrameMaker 10/Adobe Acrobat Question
Next by Author: RE: wording q - is "both" superfluous?
Previous by Thread: RE: NLA (no longer an acronym)?
Next by Thread: RE: NLA (no longer an acronym)?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads