Re: IS or ARE

Subject: Re: IS or ARE
From: Phil03 <philstokes03 -at- googlemail -dot- com>
To: Lauren <lauren -at- writeco -dot- net>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 00:54:54 +0700

Hi Lauren

In parts I agree, in others not.

This is certainly correct, from a normative point of view:

> the real arbiter of what is correct is how the phrase will be read. If writers can find and debate the awkwardness in reading "two months of" as an "is," then readers will stumble on this awkwardness, too.


As for this:

> He is correct, but he described a subjective construct

In the sense that I understand you here (but I admit I may not understand you correctly), ALL meaning is 'subjective'. A more accurate way to express that is to say all TEXT must be interpreted by the reader.

With regards to:

> For example, employment policies contain references like, "6 months employment," for probation, since the unit of time is six months long rather than six units of time that are each one month long.
>

If someone were to ask you to explain the meaning of 'six months employment' would it not be as good an explanation as any to say 'it means employment for (a period of) six months.'? I'm not sure what would be a better explanation of meaning here.

And if it is a good explanation, then, as I said right from the beginning, the singular is correct in: 'Six months of employment IS the period of service'.

Apologies if I've missed the point.


Phil
http://applehelpwriter.com

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help. Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need.

Try Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.

http://bit.ly/doc-to-help

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


Follow-Ups:

References:
IS or ARE: From: John Posada
Re: IS or ARE: From: Lauren
RE: IS or ARE: From: Joyce . Fetterman
Re: IS or ARE: From: Lauren
Re: IS or ARE: From: Chris Morton
Re: IS or ARE: From: Lauren

Previous by Author: Re: IS or ARE
Next by Author: RE: Technical Writing vs. Professional Writing
Previous by Thread: Re: IS or ARE
Next by Thread: Re: IS or ARE


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads