Re: STE corporate dictionary

Subject: Re: STE corporate dictionary
From: Milan Davidović <milan -dot- lists -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: Kit Brown-Hoekstra <kit -dot- brown -at- comgenesis -dot- com>
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2012 16:18:35 -0400

On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Kit Brown-Hoekstra
<kit -dot- brown -at- comgenesis -dot- com> wrote:
> Avoid adding technical verbs, if you can. I say this because of the way we
> process unfamiliar terminology

"We" as in people who read? If so, is there publicly accessible
research on this?


Milan DavidoviÄ

Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help. Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need.

Try Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @


RE: STE corporate dictionary: From: Kit Brown-Hoekstra

Next by Author: Re: is there a word - for typing the wrong homophone ?
Previous by Thread: RE: STE corporate dictionary
Next by Thread: RE: STE corporate dictionary

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads