Re: author / audience responsibility

Subject: Re: author / audience responsibility
From: Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: sphilip <philstokes03 -at- googlemail -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 10:36:20 -0700

It would be totally invalid. Especially if, as in this case, you could
actually read peoples' comments and see for yourself that there was no
misunderstanding of the original content.

Gene Kim-Eng

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 5:28 AM, sphilip <philstokes03 -at- googlemail -dot- com>wrote:

> I couldn't help thinking how that way of putting it seemed to put the
> blame on others failure to understand rather than on his own to
> communicate, and just how invalid that defence would be if he were a
> technical writer!
Writer Tip: You have more time to author content with Doc-To-Help, because your project can be up and running in 3 steps.

See the &#8220;Getting Started with Doc-To-Help&#8221; blog post.

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @

I love this group: From: Cardimon, Craig
author / audience responsibility: From: sphilip

Previous by Author: Re: When to use the word "button" -- ?
Next by Author: Re: When to use the word "button" -- ?
Previous by Thread: Re: author / audience responsibility
Next by Thread: RE: I love this group

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads