TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: Refering to images From:"Kay A. Pentecost" <kayp -at- ix -dot- netcom -dot- com> To:"Weissman,Jessica" <WeissmanJ -at- abacustech -dot- com>, Tech Whirl <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:58:41 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
I'm not sure, with all the (wonderful) responses, what exactly the "it" is that will be fine. Could you tell me exactly what "it" is?
As for clicking the link, the users reading this will probably have a paper copy. Old-fashioned, I know, but that's how it works here.
>From: "Weissman, Jessica" <WeissmanJ -at- abacustech -dot- com>
>Sent: Jan 10, 2013 2:36 PM
>To: "Kay A. Pentecost" <kayp -at- ix -dot- netcom -dot- com>, Tech Whirl <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
>Subject: RE: Refering to images
>Cut the Exhibit Caption part of it and it is just fine. Clear, not clunky, and the caption probably doesn't add significantly to understanding. Let 'em just click the link or find the exhibit if they need it.
Writer Tip: Create 10 different outputs with Doc-To-Help -- including Mobile and EPUB.