Re: An interview question

Subject: Re: An interview question
From: Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: Keith Hood <klhra -at- yahoo -dot- com>
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 16:49:13 -0800

They do, but not the way you're thinking. Comments that explain what key
portions of code do in language non technical readers will understand helps
verify dates of copyrighted and patented SW. User convenience doesn't
necessarily enter into it.

Gene Kim-Eng

On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Keith Hood <klhra -at- yahoo -dot- com> wrote:

> I wonder if Apple actually lives up to the idea of documenting its code
> well.
>From our sponsor Doc-to-Help: Want to see a Doc-To-Help web-based Help sample with DISQUS for user commenting?

Learn more:


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @

An interview question: From: Peter Neilson
Re: An interview question: From: phil stokes
Re: An interview question: From: Robert Lauriston
Re: An interview question: From: Keith Hood

Previous by Author: Re: An interview question
Next by Author: Join Us for a TechWhirl Live Interview with Mike Hamilton and Jennifer White of MadCap this Wednesday at 1PM Eastern
Previous by Thread: Re: An interview question
Next by Thread: TechWhirl: Technical Communication Recap for March 29, 2013

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads