Re: Commenting Code (was Re: An interview question)

Subject: Re: Commenting Code (was Re: An interview question)
From: Nick Murray <flutable -at- hotmail -dot- com>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 19:52:25 +1100

I disagree. The code tells you "how" something was done. The comments tell you "why" (ideally). The purposes are thus orthogonal, and complementary.


On 31/03/2013 6:43 PM, phil stokes wrote:

I have some sympathy with the 'no comments' philosophy in coding. A good
programmer can read the code anyway, and comments just get in the way.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
From our sponsor Doc-to-Help: Want to see a Doc-To-Help web-based Help sample with DISQUS for user commenting?

Learn more: http://bit.ly/13xpg5n

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


Follow-Ups:

References:
Commenting Code (was Re: An interview question): From: phil stokes

Previous by Author: Re: Need a word
Next by Author: Re: Commenting Code (was Re: An interview question)
Previous by Thread: Re: Commenting Code (was Re: An interview question)
Next by Thread: Re: Commenting Code (was Re: An interview question)


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads