Re: plural form?

Subject: Re: plural form?
From: Becca <becca_price -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: tech2wr-l <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 16:24:17 -0700 (PDT)

Thank you all for confirming what I thought.

There's no such thing as useless information; only information I haven't used yet.

> From: Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
>To: Becca <becca -at- di -dot- org>; TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- techwr-l -dot- com>
>Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 6:52 PM
>Subject: Re: plural form?
>On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Becca <becca_price -at- yahoo -dot- com> wrote:
>> what is the proper plural form of hypothesis?
>From our sponsor Doc-to-Help: Want to see a Doc-To-Help web-based Help sample with DISQUS for user commenting?

Learn more:


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @

plural form?: From: Becca

Previous by Author: plural form?
Next by Author: regex tutorial?
Previous by Thread: Re: plural form?
Next by Thread: regex tutorial?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads