Re: Capitalization debate

Subject: Re: Capitalization debate
From: Tony Chung <tonyc -at- tonychung -dot- ca>
To: Peter Neilson <neilson -at- windstream -dot- net>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 10:35:34 -0700

BTW this wasn't a slight against my buddy Peter. I just tagged onto the
last email in the thread. ;-)


On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Tony Chung <tonyc -at- tonychung -dot- ca> wrote:

> Some of you whirlers give the Glasgow Program agency too much credit.
> Their focus is on running their P/program, and probably don't regulate the
> capital P or small p. Apart from the official name of the program,
> capitalization decisions should be the responsibility of the style guide.
> I'm willing to bet this group doesn't have one, or doesn't follow one.
>
> I've worried about all kinds of stuff earlier in my career: The wording of
> copyright statements, consistent Canadian vs US spelling within the same
> document, etc., meanwhile there are kids starving in the third world and
> addicts in my backyard who can't get proper treatment.
>
> It's all a matter of perspective.
>
> -Tony
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Peter Neilson <neilson -at- windstream -dot- net>wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 21 May 2013 12:57:41 -0400, Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> They appear to be of two minds on this as well.
>>>
>>> http://www.gla.ac.uk/**researchinstitutes/icams/**
>>> research/heartresearchtheme/**electrocardiology/**ecgdevelopment/<http://www.gla.ac.uk/researchinstitutes/icams/research/heartresearchtheme/electrocardiology/ecgdevelopment/>
>>>
>>
>> Clearly (or perhaps obscurely) some of their people understand the
>> correct capitalisation and others do not. Might ask them to make a
>> decision. "Let's you and he fight."
>>
>>
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>From our sponsor Doc-to-Help: Want to see a Doc-To-Help web-based Help sample with DISQUS for user commenting?

Learn more: http://bit.ly/13xpg5n

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


References:
Re: Capitalization debate: From: Peter Neilson
Re: Capitalization debate: From: Tony Chung

Previous by Author: Re: Capitalization debate
Next by Author: Re: Make Your Voice Heard: Take the Adobe Tech Comm Survey: What You SAY is What You Get
Previous by Thread: Re: Capitalization debate
Next by Thread: Re: Capitalization debate


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads