Re: Taking active vs. passive voice too far

Subject: Re: Taking active vs. passive voice too far
From: Tony Chung <tonyc -at- tonychung -dot- ca>
To: M -dot- Vina-Baltsas -at- mindray -dot- com
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 09:19:59 -0700

Hi Michelle,

To respond to your first question:

On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 7:45 AM, <M -dot- Vina-Baltsas -at- mindray -dot- com> wrote:

> I'm working with a manual that was primarily written in the passive voice.
> I'm struggling with how far I should go with my edits.

Are you familiar with JPL's Levels of Edit? I have to be honest that I
haven't read the entire thing myself. However, I used to work for a company
that defined their levels of edit around JPL's. It also ties in with the
"exhaustive, fast, and cheap -- pick two" analogy.

Some links:

Hope this helps.


New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.

Learn more:


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @

Taking active vs. passive voice too far: From: M . Vina-Baltsas

Previous by Author: Re: looking for - serial comma cartoon, in public domain
Next by Author: Re: ever taken classes - from BigDataUniversity?
Previous by Thread: Re: Taking active vs. passive voice too far
Next by Thread: RE: Taking active vs. passive voice too far

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads