Re: [External] Re: SharePoint question

Subject: Re: [External] Re: SharePoint question
From: "Peter Neilson" <neilson -at- windstream -dot- net>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 20:28:23 -0400

On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 17:24:14 -0400, Chinell, Bear CCS <David -dot- Chinell -at- fs -dot- utc -dot- com> wrote:

We don't permit anyone to access the (Word) source files outside the Tech Pubs department.

In my (ever jaundiced) view this is the correct approach. I throw mental spitballs at reviewers who say, "Just let me make the changes. Then you won't have to."

I think they are the same reviewers who worry about commas but fail to detect the paragraph that describes the previous version of the interface. Once upon a time, in a twisty little company on a planet far, far away, I considered adding technically incorrect material so that I could find out if anyone actually read the draft copy. (In software testing it's called "bebugging.") Never did it. There were always enough things wrong even in the final drafts.

New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.

Learn more:


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @


RE: SharePoint question: From: Combs, Richard
Re: SharePoint question: From: Matt Gras

Previous by Author: Re: how to handle power point slides?
Next by Author: Re: verb noun install fail
Previous by Thread: RE: SharePoint question
Next by Thread: Re: [External] Re: SharePoint question

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads