Re: Tables of Figures and Tables -- useful?
Speaking as a documentation consumer, other than being able to ask a support person about item 2 in table 23-1, I've always wondered about what helpful purpose is served to the reader by having and numbering these.
On 8/29/2013 3:24 PM, Matt Gras wrote:
I'm helping a smallish engineering company upgrade its documentation. It's been a battle persuading them to include a TOC in their reference guides -- and now they're balking at including tables of figures and tables. I'm wondering if they might be right -- that these lists add more clutter than useful info.
New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.
Learn more: http://bit.ly/ZeOZeQ
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.
Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com
Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
Previous by Author:
Re: Is your company's doc team responsible for writing documents for audit purposes?
Next by Author: Punctuation in quotes -- American style
Previous by Thread: RE: Structured FrameMaker Master Pages
Next by Thread: TechWhirl: Technical Communication Recap for August 30
Visit TechWhirl's Other Sites