Re: Tools statistics

Subject: Re: Tools statistics
From: Shawn C <shawn -at- convergent -dot- io>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 13:56:40 -0700

> I used Flare 6 through 7.1. PDF output had a lot of bugs (particularly
regarding tables), supposedly many of those were fixed in version 8.

That would have been a deal breaker for me. Fortunately in v9.11, tables
work as well as any tool (though some tweaking is required in css or the
html, on occasion).

>I had no problems at all with bitmapped screen shots once I figured out
that I had to use a third-party image editor to set the dpi.

I have MadCap Capture but I haven't learned how to use this tool yet. In
the meantime, I am also using other 3rd party tools (i.e. Photoshop and
Snagit). I should add that as a best practice for PDF output, use vector
images such as .eps or .svg whenever possible.



On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>wrote:

> I used Flare 6 through 7.1. PDF output had a lot of bugs (particularly
> regarding tables), supposedly many of those were fixed in version 8.
> Named destinations were not supported until version 8, which meant
> that you couldn't link to a particular topic in a PDF from another PDF
> or web page, which was a dealbreaker for that particular job.
>
> I had no problems at all with bitmapped screen shots once I figured
> out that I had to use a third-party image editor to set the dpi.
>
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Shawn C <shawn -at- convergent -dot- io> wrote:
> > Hello Robert,
> >
> > You have to remember that VMware is pretty large and they use a whole lot
> > of different tool in different departments. But I was curious, as well...
> > before buying. I didn't get my own answer fast enough and discovered that
> > if you search for MadCap, using VMware's website search function, it will
> > list about 68 documents authored in MadCap Flare.
> >
> > What I observed in looking over different VMware documentation was:
> >
> > - MadCap Flare (v6) produces good results (except the VMware authors
> would
> > have produced much better documentation if they had inserted .svg images
> > instead of bitmap)
>
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for
> authoring.
>
> Learn more: http://bit.ly/ZeOZeQ
>
--
Shawn Connelly
technical writer
<http://convergent.io> <shawn -at- convergent -dot- io>


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.

Learn more: http://bit.ly/ZeOZeQ

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


Follow-Ups:

References:
Tools statistics: From: Rick Quatro
Re: Tools statistics: From: Shawn C
Re: Tools statistics: From: Robert Lauriston
Re: Tools statistics: From: Shawn C
Re: Tools statistics: From: Mark Giffin
Re: Tools statistics: From: Shawn C
Re: Tools statistics: From: Robert Lauriston
Re: Tools statistics: From: Shawn C
Re: Tools statistics: From: Robert Lauriston

Previous by Author: Re: Tools statistics
Next by Author: Re: Tools statistics
Previous by Thread: Re: Tools statistics
Next by Thread: Re: Tools statistics


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads