TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: Perform vs. do From:"Barb" <caslon -at- windstream -dot- net> To:"'Milan Davidovic'" <milan -dot- lists -at- gmail -dot- com> Date:Fri, 11 Oct 2013 21:00:01 -0400
We've been trying to move to more ESL-friendly language, plus plainlanguage.gov recommends "do" over "perform" (but with no explanation). We've been trying to use "do" instead, but it sounds strange. Because it sounds strange, our department members have been sporadic about using it. This in turn has resulted in inconsistent usage, so we're trying to establish rules around when to and not to use "perform" and "do" (or, ideally, use one of them consistently).
I've found that sometimes there's a grammatical reason when things sound strange (rules we've internalized but forgotten). In this case, I'm not finding one.
From: Milan Davidovic [mailto:milan -dot- lists -at- gmail -dot- com]
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 4:00 PM
To: Barbara Philbrick
Cc: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: Re: Perform vs. do
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Barbara Philbrick <caslon -at- windstream -dot- net> wrote:
> Our writing group is trying to decide if we should start using "do" instead of "perform" for lead-in statements to procedures.
How did this come up?
Sent from my Yost 10
New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.