Re: Convention for navigation labels in documentation

Subject: Re: Convention for navigation labels in documentation
From: Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
To: Ron Hearn <rhearn -at- central1 -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 13:13:51 -0700

Definitely no standard, different places I've worked have had
different conventions. I think the most common is bold.

Italic is commonly used for placeholders for strings that will vary
from one user to another.

On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Ron Hearn <rhearn -at- central1 -dot- com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> Our Product Marketing Manager asked me if there is an industry standard for the font treatment used when describing the names of labels for navigation that exists within a program. For instance, if we were to describe the following:
> You'll find this report in Adobe Analytics under Site Metrics > Anomaly Detection.
> Should bold, italics or " " marks for Site Metrics > Anomaly Detection?
> I generally use bold for the labels, but it would be nice to know if there is a general standard.

New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.

Learn more:


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @


Convention for navigation labels in documentation: From: Ron Hearn

Previous by Author: Re: And Or situations
Next by Author: Re: more formal title - technical teaser ?
Previous by Thread: Convention for navigation labels in documentation
Next by Thread: RE: Convention for navigation labels in documentation

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads