TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Using tables for content From:Char James-Tanny <charjtf -at- gmail -dot- com> To:Sean <seanb_us -at- yahoo -dot- com> Date:Thu, 24 Oct 2013 13:00:00 -0400
Tables should only be used for tabular data, and for accessibility, should
be formatted correctly so that they can be interpreted by screen readers.
(In Word, this means applying table header and table body styles, and
applying "Repeat Header Rows"; in HTML, it means using <thead>, <tbody>,
etc.)
Also, correctly formatted tables help users with cognitive issues and low
vision better interpret the content. (Assuming that the styles have been
set up correctly.)
Char James-Tanny ~ JTF Associates, Inc. ~ http://www.jtfassociates.com
----------------------------------------------------------
Please send follow-up questions to the list. (Inquiries sent off-list may
not be seen.)
Contact me directly (CharJT at jtfassociates dot com) with business
inquiries.
----------------------------------------------------------
Find a Help Authoring Tool at HAT-Matrix.com ~ http://hat-matrix.com
Web site Hosting and Design ~ http://www.jtfhosting.com
Author of "Learning Author-it"
W3C WAI Invited Expert ~ Accessibility API Task Force (HTML5)
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Sean <seanb_us -at- yahoo -dot- com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> So, whilst I search the archives, can we have a live discussion on the
> pros and cons of using tables for tech writing content. Consider a
> traditional procedure that uses step: in the left column, the action, and
> in the right column, the result. It seems, for Word, each row needs to be
> numbered manually.
>
> Conversely, there is standard ordered list approach without using a table.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Sean
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.