Re: So now we are content engineers?

Subject: Re: So now we are content engineers?
From: Lauren <lauren -at- writeco -dot- net>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 10:04:09 -0800

On 11/7/2013 9:53 AM, Tony Chung wrote:

It's not about content or format, but rather the systems and means to get
the right information into the right hands at the right time. Sounds like
engineering to me.

Designing systems according to specifications is engineering. Designing means is process analysis. Reducing system engineering and process analyses to a writing is technical writing.




^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.

Learn more: http://bit.ly/ZeOZeQ

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


Follow-Ups:

References:
Re: So now we are content engineers?: From: Chris Despopoulos
Re: So now we are content engineers?: From: Gene Kim-Eng
Re: So now we are content engineers?: From: Tony Chung

Previous by Author: Re: So now we are content engineers?
Next by Author: Re: [TechWhirl Forums] Authors who cannot write
Previous by Thread: Re: So now we are content engineers?
Next by Thread: Re: So now we are content engineers?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads