Re: Footnotes - acceptable in technical documentation?

Subject: Re: Footnotes - acceptable in technical documentation?
From: Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: "Bruce Megan (ST-CO/MKP3)" <Megan -dot- Bruce -at- us -dot- bosch -dot- com>, TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 10:11:00 -0800

I would just make it a note.

Gene Kim-Eng


On 11/8/2013 8:33 AM, Bruce Megan (ST-CO/MKP3) wrote:

Hello All:

What are you thoughts on footnotes in technical documentation? I have been told that footnotes in technical documentation is forbidden because instructions show the reader how to do something, and footnotes distract the reader from instruction.

Your thoughts?



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.

Learn more: http://bit.ly/ZeOZeQ

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


References:
Footnotes - acceptable in technical documentation?: From: Bruce Megan (ST-CO/MKP3)

Previous by Author: Re: So now we are content engineers?
Next by Author: Re: So now we are content engineers?
Previous by Thread: RE: Footnotes - acceptable in technical documentation?
Next by Thread: Re: Footnotes - acceptable in technical documentation?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads