Re: Coding documentation?

Subject: Re: Coding documentation?
From: Milan Davidović <milan -dot- lists -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: techwr-l <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 14:56:03 -0500

On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Hannah Drake <hannah -at- formulatrix -dot- com> wrote:
> But, the convention they use for our part numbers doesn't quite work for
> documentation.

Can you elaborate?

--Milan DavidoviÄ

Sent from my Commercial Visible 6


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.

Learn more: http://bit.ly/ZeOZeQ

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


Follow-Ups:

References:
Coding documentation?: From: Hannah Drake

Previous by Author: Re: best current books for teaching tech writing?
Next by Author: Re: Coding documentation?
Previous by Thread: Re: Coding documentation?
Next by Thread: Re: Coding documentation?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads