Re: On the value of glossaries containing terms the audience should already know

Subject: Re: On the value of glossaries containing terms the audience should already know
From: Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
To: "Elissa K. Miller" <emiller -at- doubleknot -dot- com>, techwrl <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 08:45:08 -0800

I think it would be weird to define RFC, SSH, LDAP, DNS, or IP in a
document aimed at network administrators or the like. That would be
like defining "tire" in a car manual.

If somebody wonders what USB stands for they can Google it.


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.

Learn more: http://bit.ly/ZeOZeQ

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


Follow-Ups:

References:
On the value of glossaries containing terms the audience should already know: From: Elissa K. Miller

Previous by Author: Re: upload/download
Next by Author: Re: [BULK] Re: On the value of glossaries containing terms the audience should already know
Previous by Thread: Re: On the value of glossaries containing terms the audience should already know
Next by Thread: RE: On the value of glossaries containing terms the audience should already know


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads