RE: ghost town

Subject: RE: ghost town
From: "McLauchlan, Kevin" <Kevin -dot- McLauchlan -at- safenet-inc -dot- com>
To: Michael McCallister <workingwriter -at- gmail -dot- com>, "TECHWR-L (techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com)" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 15:01:02 -0500

Maybe the list admin can give us an update on the struggle to [re-]integrate the list with the forum - and get the list mentioned on the site, with some links to join - in the weekly round-up.

Has anybody else, on another site or blog, managed to get a forum and a mailing list to integrate smoothly?

Or do our beloved list owners have all the arrows in their butts (from being pioneers)?


-----Original Message-----
From: Michael McCallister
Sent: February-13-14 11:39 AM
To: TECHWR-L (techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com)
Cc: Connie Giordano
Subject: Re: ghost town

Folks,

For Hannah's benefit, the Forum is still alive (though not integrated with this list): http://community.techwhirl.com

David: I think I still have Peter Kent's book; it was helpful when I got started.

On Google: When your search results come up, over in the upper right corner of the page, you'll see a pair of icons. The default setting is the little head-and-shoulders icon indicating personalized results. Click the globe next to it, and you'll see what you used to see. In a search for technical writing (no quotes), the Top 5 results were the same for me: Two Wikipedia articles, the Bureau of Labor Statistics article, Techwhirl's "What is Technical Writing?" page (which I think Connie wrote), and a PDF for MIT's Basics of Technical Writing, Part 1.

Now if you click on that link to TechWhirl, you wouldn't know that there's a mailing list associated with the site. You would know there's a forum, because it's in the navigation. Perhaps that's a hint as to "where the youth are." Similarly, there's no "Subscribe to TechWr-L" button. There's a link to the archives, but ... perhaps there's a conclusion to be drawn, but I won't go there.

This is a discussion worth having, BTW.


*Michael McCallister*
ProTek Writing Services


On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 9:58 AM, David Renn <daverenn08 -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:

> The only reason I found this listserv is because this past summer I
> picked up a book by Peter Kent called *Making Money in Technical
> Writing*. It just so happens that this book was published in the 90s.
> I'm relatively new to the industry having only been in tech writing
> for 5 1/2 years, so when it came to searching for material about our
> industry, I would basically stick with STC and all things affiliated
> and a few blogs, most namely by Tom Johnson and Mark Baker. It took me 5 years to find techwr-l.
>
> I think the format of the listserv is a bit 90s still, which may be
> why it's tough to find. Although, to be honest, techwr-l might be my
> favorite source of industry information these days, and it's nice to
> be able to post a quick question and receive 5 enthusiastic responses within an hour.
>
> I think the listserv is tough to find because when you typically
> search for technical writing-related material, STC pops up first and
> is basically the dominant industry community. I like Techwhirl better,
> but it's much tougher to find. I feel like people need to stumble into it by chance to find it.
> Then the listserv is even tougher to find, and it has an outdated
> feel, which may turn away some prospective members.
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Milan DavidoviÄ
> <milan -dot- lists -at- gmail -dot- com
> >wrote:
>
> > Also, in search results for "technical writing" (with or without
> > quotes), where does this list (or the site) appear? When I do the
> > search on Google, I don't see it on the first page.
> >
> > --Milan DavidoviÄ
> >
> > Sent from my Commercial Visible 6
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Dan Goldstein
> > <DGoldstein -at- cytomedix -dot- com
> >
> > wrote:
> > > In theory, someone other than the moderators could volunteer to
> > > spread
> > the good word.
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>


The information contained in this electronic mail transmission
may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected
from disclosure. If you have received this communication in
error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
message and deleting it from your computer without copying
or disclosing it.


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Doc-To-Help: new website, content widgets, and an output that works on any screen.

Learn more: http://bit.ly/1eRs4NS

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


Follow-Ups:

References:
ghost town: From: McLauchlan, Kevin
RE: ghost town: From: Brian.Henderson
RE: ghost town: From: McLauchlan, Kevin
RE: ghost town: From: Dan Goldstein
Re: ghost town: From: Milan Davidović
Re: ghost town: From: David Renn
Re: ghost town: From: Michael McCallister

Previous by Author: RE: membership and participation (was RE: ghost town)
Next by Author: RE: ghost town
Previous by Thread: Re: ghost town
Next by Thread: Re: ghost town


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads