RE: Are Tech Writers Valid anymore Re: ghost town -

Subject: RE: Are Tech Writers Valid anymore Re: ghost town -
From: "Cardimon, Craig" <ccardimon -at- M-S-G -dot- com>
To: 'Dan Goldstein' <DGoldstein -at- cytomedix -dot- com>, "'TECHWR-L (techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com)'" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 20:28:10 +0000

I spend most of my time writing end-user documentation. Shrug.

Craig

-----Original Message-----
From: techwr-l-bounces+ccardimon=m-s-g -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com [mailto:techwr-l-bounces+ccardimon=m-s-g -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On Behalf Of Dan Goldstein
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 3:21 PM
To: TECHWR-L (techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com)
Subject: RE: Are Tech Writers Valid anymore Re: ghost town -

With the usual caveat: Many tech writers spend little to none of their time writing end-user documentation. <raises hand>

-----Original Message-----
From: Keith Hood
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 1:43 PM
To: Tony Chung
Cc: techwr-l
Subject: Re: Are Tech Writers Valid anymore Re: ghost town -

Here's the take that I had from a boss many years ago: the job of tech writer would not exist at all did not customers expect documentation...


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Doc-To-Help: new website, content widgets, and an output that works on any screen.

Learn more: http://bit.ly/1eRs4NS

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as ccardimon -at- m-s-g -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
Information contained in this e-mail transmission is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, do not read, distribute or reproduce this transmission (including any attachments). If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by telephone or email reply.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Doc-To-Help: new website, content widgets, and an output that works on any screen.

Learn more: http://bit.ly/1eRs4NS

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


References:
ghost town: From: McLauchlan, Kevin
Re: ghost town: From: Tony Chung
Are Tech Writers Valid anymore Re: ghost town -: From: William Sherman
Re: Are Tech Writers Valid anymore Re: ghost town -: From: Milan Davidović
Re: Are Tech Writers Valid anymore Re: ghost town -: From: Tony Chung
Re: Are Tech Writers Valid anymore Re: ghost town -: From: Keith Hood
RE: Are Tech Writers Valid anymore Re: ghost town -: From: Dan Goldstein

Previous by Author: RE: OT: A new word was invented today.
Next by Author: "techcom" or "techcomm" -- ?
Previous by Thread: RE: Are Tech Writers Valid anymore Re: ghost town -
Next by Thread: Re: Are Tech Writers Valid anymore Re: ghost town -


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads