TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: A status bar by any other name... From:Tony Chung <tonyc -at- tonychung -dot- ca> To:Hannah Drake <hannah -at- formulatrix -dot- com> Date:Tue, 25 Mar 2014 15:19:39 -0700
Good choice. It also probably garnered a chuckle as it could sound like
"foobar" under the right conditions.
-T
On Tuesday, March 25, 2014, Hannah Drake <hannah -at- formulatrix -dot- com> wrote:
> Thanks all. We're going with Steve's suggestion of Viewbar - unless we add
> some kind of status to the bar, in which case we will call it a Status Bar.
> I have an issue with calling it a Status Bar when it doesn't actually have
> any kind of status on it.
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Janoff, Steven <Steven -dot- Janoff -at- ga -dot- com<javascript:;>
> >wrote:
>
> > Viewbar... :)
> >
> > Steve
> >
> > Hannah Drake wrote on Friday, March 21, 2014 3:28 PM:
> > The problem with that is, we already have the conventional quick access
> > bar (ribbon menu). I like toolbar, but I'm wondering if it will confuse
> > users since this one runs along the bottom of the UI. Any other
> suggestions?
> > ...
> >
>
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Doc-To-Help 2014 v1 now available. SharePoint 2013 support, NetHelp enhancements, and more. Read all about it.