Assume web-server knowledge?

Subject: Assume web-server knowledge?
From: "McLauchlan, Kevin" <Kevin -dot- McLauchlan -at- safenet-inc -dot- com>
To: "techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 11:47:07 -0400

All,

We currently have our product docs arranged in a set of books, like "Installation Guide", "Configuration Guide", "Administration Guide", etc. all of which are PDFs, but which are also webhelp-ish HTML pages (it's all done in Flare). In the output, there's a home page that provides a brief description of each "book" with links to the PDF and to the "first" page of the html version. Naturally the html version is all interconnected, with the "book" conceit being just an organizing principle. If a user prefers the PDFs, they have their internal Xrefs, as well as links to the other members of the set... as long as they all remain in their original file relationships (i.e., if you move a PDF somewhere, all external links break).

It works fine when accessed from the DVD, or when the whole file structure is copied to a local or networked hard drive, and similarly accessed via the file system. This, of course, assumes that the person reading has the relevant access to that file system. So, members of a department or a business unit can probably access the docs from a file server.

For other situations, it's easy enough to just copy the DVD content to an existing web server owned by the customer. It's what we do, in-house, for access by reviewers from other departments who don't have file access to our stuff.

My question is when serving from a webserver is contemplated, should we have any more instruction in the README than "Copy the contents of the documentation DVD to the web server"?

Should we just assume that anyone doing it knows where it should go, where the top index file would need to go, whether or where any web.config file might go, etc.?


I'm ok with either approach, but I would like arguments for-or-against.



The information contained in this electronic mail transmission
may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected
from disclosure. If you have received this communication in
error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
message and deleting it from your computer without copying
or disclosing it.




^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Doc-To-Help 2014 v1 now available. SharePoint 2013 support, NetHelp enhancements, and more. Read all about it.

Learn more: http://bit.ly/NNcWqS

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: RE: Terminology Question
Next by Author: Separate Guides?
Previous by Thread: FW: Authoring Tool for Online Help
Next by Thread: Re: Assume web-server knowledge?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads