RE: Terminology Question

Subject: RE: Terminology Question
From: "McLauchlan, Kevin" <Kevin -dot- McLauchlan -at- safenet-inc -dot- com>
To: David Artman <david -at- davidartman -dot- com>, Joel W <eleysium -at- outlook -dot- com>, "techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 14:44:35 -0400

I would be bouncing up and down if that came past me.

"Focus" is the word.

There absolutely should be some form of cursor inside a data/text entry box/field.
Moreover, passable UI design would have the border of the active box change color and move or "glow" or throb or something to draw the user's eye to that location.

Or "pre-fill" the next box with "Fill me" (or "feed me", or "Under-employed - will work for text"...) in light gray lettering that would be overwritten as the user started typing

-----Original Message-----
From: David Artman
Sent: July-17-14 1:21 PM
To: Joel W; techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: RE: Terminology Question

"focus" is common parlance in OSs.

Perhaps "text entry focus" to be specific as to what the user is doing.

And I'd also issue a Priority 1 bug for such an inane usability issue
and, when they make the cursor visible again, call it the "text
cursor".

Or as others have suggested, unask the question and don't speak to
focus/cursor-location shifts.

HTH, my 2A-c-, YMMV, IANADM;

David

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Terminology Question
From: Joel W <[1]eleysium -at- outlook -dot- com>
Date: Fri, May 30, 2014 2:41 pm
To: "[2]techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com" <[3]techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Let's say you have a screen with several boxes / fields for entering
data. The user moves from one box to the other, but there isn't a
cursor in the box to indicate what box she is using. What do you call
the presence in the box? i.e.:"Press enter. The ____ moves to the next
box."
Thanks,
Joel


The information contained in this electronic mail transmission
may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected
from disclosure. If you have received this communication in
error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
message and deleting it from your computer without copying
or disclosing it.



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Read about how Georgia System Operation Corporation improved teamwork, communication, and efficiency using Doc-To-Help | http://bit.ly/1lRPd2l

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


References:
RE: Terminology Question: From: David Artman

Previous by Author: RE: Using jira for documentation development workflows
Next by Author: RE: Can style trump grammar rules?
Previous by Thread: RE: Terminology Question
Next by Thread: TechWhirl: Technical Communication Recap for July 18, 2014


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads