Re: P&P suggestions

Subject: Re: P&P suggestions
From: Jay Maechtlen <techwriter -at- laserpubs -dot- com>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 14:33:30 -0700

On 9/19/2014 1:20 PM, Keith Hood wrote:

What's wrong with providing an index?

On Friday, September 19, 2014 2:37 PM, Peter Neilson <neilson -at- windstream -dot- net> wrote:

That would make a lot of sense.
Did I mention this is for a government?

Each Policy, AO, and Procedure will be a standalone document.
I am working totally remote, and can't even see their intranet.
So, they will have to figure out findability themselves.

Ah - I need to ask them how AO numbers are determined, and see if we can reserve a block for this project.
Ditto Procedure numbers (or whatever identifiers they use.)

fun, fun, fun.

Jay Maechtlen
626 444-5112 office
626 840-8875 cell

This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.

Read about how Georgia System Operation Corporation improved teamwork, communication, and efficiency using Doc-To-Help |


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @


Re: P&P suggestions: From: Peter Neilson
Re: P&P suggestions: From: Keith Hood

Previous by Author: Re: P&P suggestions
Next by Author: Re: Questions about the work day for the Whirlers
Previous by Thread: Re: P&P suggestions
Next by Thread: Re: P&P suggestions

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads