Re: RTFM? Really?

Subject: Re: RTFM? Really?
From: Nancy Allison <maker -at- verizon -dot- net>
To: kylesimmons0164 -at- gmail -dot- com, techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 11:53:20 -0500 (CDT)

The RTFM discussion concerns only calls that come in. It does not
concern, or quantify, the calls that did not come in because people did
indeed consult the manual, got the answer they needed, and therefore
did not call.


On 09/26/14, Karl Norman<kylesimmons0164 -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:

I've noticed that when members of this listserv start talking about

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Read about how Georgia System Operation Corporation improved teamwork, communication, and efficiency using Doc-To-Help | http://bit.ly/1lRPd2l

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: The Source of Bad Writing - WSJ
Next by Author: Re: Re: RTFM? Really?
Previous by Thread: Re: RTFM? Really?
Next by Thread: Re: RTFM? Really?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads