Re: Politically correct term for four-eyes authorization?

Subject: Re: Politically correct term for four-eyes authorization?
From: Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
To: TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 07:21:49 -0700

"Authorization required" or "approval required" depending on the sequence.

I've never heard "four-eyes" and it sounds more like the two-person rule anyway.

On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 1:02 AM, Robert Fekete
<fekete77 -dot- robert -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:
> In our setup, ... one of the users ... performs the action, and the other approves ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Learn more about Adobe Technical Communication Suite (2015 Release) | http://bit.ly/1FR7zNW

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


References:
Politically correct term for four-eyes authorization?: From: Robert Fekete

Previous by Author: Re: "Are technical writers the unsung heroes of document generation?"
Next by Author: Re: Politically correct term for four-eyes authorization?
Previous by Thread: Re: Politically correct term for four-eyes authorization?
Next by Thread: Re: Politically correct term for four-eyes authorization?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads