Re: Is (technical) writing more art, or science?

Subject: Re: Is (technical) writing more art, or science?
From: Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: Lin Sims <ljsims -dot- ml -at- gmail -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 11:15:30 -0700

The term for this kind of variant is "snowclones."

Gene Kim-Eng


On 8/21/2015 10:47 AM, Lin Sims wrote:


I've heard a variant that "Any sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology." And, of course, "Any sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from a rigged demo."

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Learn more about Adobe Technical Communication Suite (2015 Release) | http://bit.ly/1FR7zNW

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


References:
Is (technical) writing more art, or science?: From: Cardimon, Craig
Re: Is (technical) writing more art, or science?: From: Gene Kim-Eng
Re: Is (technical) writing more art, or science?: From: Lin Sims

Previous by Author: Re: Is (technical) writing more art, or science?
Next by Author: Re: "Software Technical Writing is a Dying Career"
Previous by Thread: Re: Is (technical) writing more art, or science?
Next by Thread: Re: Is (technical) writing more art, or science?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads